1. Supreme Court's decision on Transgender Issue
2. Supreme Court on Ragging Issue
3. Constitutional validity of Sec. 377 of IPC
4. Delayed disposal of mercy petition
5. Directions about prohibiting the use of black films in all vehicles
6. Guidelines to be adopted in all cases where non bailable warrants are issued
7. Supreme Court direction about N.I.Act cases
9. Supreme Court directions and suggestions in M.V. Act cases
10. Supreme court directions about missing children
11. Supreme Court Judgement in Delhi gang-rape case
12. Courts are not justified in protecting the possession of a caretaker, servant or any person who was allowed to live as a friend, relative, caretaker or servant
14. Direction by SC for conclusion of trial in relation to sitting M.L.As and M.Ps.
16. S.C directions in the light of sec.231 read along with sec. 309 Cr.P.C for the Trial Court to ensure speedy trial of cases
19. Guidelines to be followed in case the children of women prisoner living in prison.
20. Six guidelines given by S.C to prevent custody torture
22. Directions given by S.C. regarding children working in the Indian Circuses
23. Factors to be borne in mind while considering a claim for employment on compassionate ground
24. Guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court regarding the issue of Euthanasia
25. Whether a woman central govt. employee can ask for uninterrupted 730 days of child care leave
31. Directions made by S.C in N.S.P.S Act cases
32. S.C directions in order to preserve the purity and sanctity of the P I L
33. Mohan Lal's case on NDPS Act
34. Thana Singh's case on NDPS Act
35. New Guidelines for offences punishable with imprisonment upto 7 years
37. Directions given by Apex Court for proper implementation of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006
41. Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is ultra vires the constitution and therefore void.
43. Banks should resort to procedure recognized by law to take possession of vehicles in cases where the borrower may have committed default in payment of the installments instead of taking resort to strong arm tactics
44. Position of Governor under the Constitution
45. The action of any Bar Association in passing a resolution that none of its member will appear for a particular accused is against all norms of the Constitution the Statute and professional ethics
46. The public interest demands that the trial should be conducted in a fair manner and the administration of justice would be fair and independent
Lawyers have no right to go on strike or give a call for boycott, not even on a token strike
47. We are bound to observe that the lawmakers should scrutinize, relook and revisit the sentencing policy in Sec. 304A I.P.C, we say so with immense anguish
48. A public interest litigation pertaining to speeches delivered during election campaign,we are afraid, cannot be put on the pedestal of a real PIL
49. Apex court's suggestion to the legislature to formulate a mechanism, that anyone who initiates and continues a litigation senselessly, pays for the same, by introducing a code of compulsory costs
50. It is not open to any person to employ abusive and pejorative language to the authors of a judgement...those criticize a judgement must remember that from the nature of the Judges office, he cannot reply to their criticism
51. Requirements to be followed in all cases of arrest
52. Legislature to formulate a mechanism that anyone who initiates and continues a litigation senseless, pays for the same and to consider the introduction of a code of compulsory costs.
53. Whether Minister or Chief Minister is a public servant under section 21 of I.P.C.
54. About using red lights on the vehicle
55. Supreme court direction to the Home Department of every State Government to formulate a procedure for taking action against all erring investing prosecuting official officer
56. Non-disclosure of the pending cases where cognizance has been taken or charges has been framed, it would amount to undue influence and therefore , the election is to be declared null and void by the Election Tribunal
57. The legitimate and permissible object of an advertisement can always be achieved without publication of the photograph of any particular functionary either in the State of a political party
58. When the police arrests a person in execution of a warrant of arrest obtained from a magistrate, the person so arrested shall not be handcuffed unless special order in that respect are obtained from the magistrate
59. Directions given by S.C in order to render assistance to the victims of rape
60. Allocation of spectrum in 2G band case
61. The classification of the subscribers into two categories on the basis of calls made by them is arbitrary
62. In today's society, where women are increasingly choosing to raise their children alone, we see no purpose in imposing an unwilling and unconcerned father on an otherwise viable family nucleus
63. A citizen of this country may have a right to establish educational institution but no citizen, person or institution has a right much less of fundamental right to affiliation or recognition
64. In our opinion, the lawyers should advise their clients to try for mediation for resolving the disputes, especially where relationships, like family relationships, business relationships, are involved
66. Whether the imprisonment for life means till the end of convict's life with or without any scope for remission
67. Therefore, a minimum of Rs. 3 Lakhs is to be awarded by the Government to each victim of acid attack
68. The constitutional legitimacy, naturally, must supersede all religious beliefs or practices
69. Whether all the information sought for under the R.I Act,2005 can be denied by the RBI and other Banks to the public on the ground of economic interest, commercial interest and or public interest
70. Public trusts for charitable and religious purpose are run for the benefit of the public. No individual should take benefit from them
71. The production of an Aadhaar card will not be condition for obtaining any benefits otherwise due to a citizen
72. Apex court guidelines on Government Advertisement
73. Either the candidates should not have participated in the interview and challenged the procedure or they should have challenged immediately after the interviews were conducted. One cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time
75. Whether the respondents are entitled to know the names of the examiners who have evaluated the answer sheet
76. One needs to keep in mind that in the process of litigation, there is an innocent sufferer on the other side of every irresponsible senseless claim
77. When a member of a State Legislature participates in the proceedings of the house, is that member exercising a fundamental right of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a)
78. Whether casual workers are covered under definition of employee as defined in sec. 2(9) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948
79. Candidature of those candidates who belonged to the O.B.C categories could not be rejected simply on the ground that he submitted OBC certificate after the last date mentioned in the advertisement
80. Standard operating procedure framed for the examination of Good Samaritans i.e bystanders by the police or during trial
81. Executive policies are usually enacted after much deliberation by the Government. Therefore, it would not be appropriate for this Court to question the wisdom of the same, unless it is demonstrated by the aggrieved persons that the said policy has been enacted in an arbitrary, unreasonable or malafide manner, or that it offends the provisions of the Constitution of India
82. It is settled law that a person can change his religion and faith but not the caste, to which he belongs, as caste has linkage to birth
83. Medical education must be taken very seriously and when an expert body certifies that the facilities in a medical college are inadequate, the Courts are not equipped to take a different view in the matter except for very cogent jurisdictional reasons such as malafides of the Inspection Team, ex facie perversity in the inspection report, jurisdictional error on the part of the MCI etc. Under no circumstance should the High Court examine the report as an appellate body – this is simply not the function of the High Court
84. It is the common experience of several persons with disabilities that they are unable to lead a full life due to societal barriers and discrimination faced by them in employment, access to public spaces, transportation etc. Persons with disability are most neglected lot not only in the society but also in the family. More often they are an object of pity. There are hardly any meaningful attempts to assimilate them in the mainstream of the nation's life. The apathy towards their problems is so pervasive that even the number of disabled persons existing in the country is not well documented
86. In our considered opinion, three things that need to be established by a person who claims to be a beneficiary of the caste certificate are (i) there must be absolutely clear cut proof that he belongs to the caste that has been recognised by the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950; (ii) there has been reconversion to the original religion to which the parents and earlier generations had belonged; and (iii) there has to be evidence establishing the acceptance by the community. Each aspect according to us is very significant, and if one is not substantiated, the recognition would not be possible
87. Requirements to be followed in the matters of investigating police encounters in the cases of death as the standard procedure for thorough, effective and independent investigation.
88. In fact, whatever may be the status of Fatwa during Mogul or British Rule, it has no place in independent India under our Constitutional scheme. It has no legal sanction and cannot be enforced by any legal process either by the Dar-ul-Qaza issuing that or the person concerned or for that matter anybody. The person or the body concerned may ignore it and it will not be necessary for anybody to challenge it before any court of law. It can simply be ignored. In case any person or body tries to impose it, their act would be illegal.
89. Legal profession being the most important component of justice delivery system, it must continue to perform its significant role and regulatory mechanism and should not be seen to be wanting in taking prompt action against any malpractice. We have noticed the inaction of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh as well as the Bar Council of India inspite of direction in the impugned order of the High Court and inspite of notice to the Bar Council of India by this Court. We have also noticed the failure of all concerned to advert to the observations made by the Gujarat High Court 33 years ago. Thus there appears to be urgent need to review the provisions of the Advocates Act dealing with regulatory mechanism for the legal profession and other incidental issues, in consultation with all concerned
90. The right to refuse the lowest or any other tender is always available to the government. In the case in hand, the respondent has neither pleaded nor established mala fide exercise of power by the appellant. While so, the decision of tender committee ought not to have been interfered with by the High Court. In our considered view, the High Court erred in sitting in appeal over the decision of the appellant to cancel the tender and float a fresh tender. Equally, the High Court was not right in going into the financial implication of a fresh tender
91. The threat of disciplinary proceedings must not demotivate the honest and independent officer. Yet on the other hand, there is a vital element of accountability to society involved in dealing with cases of misconduct. There is on the one hand a genuine public interest in protecting fearless and honest officers of the district judiciary from motivated criticism and attack. Equally there is a genuine public interest in holding a person who is guilty of wrong doing responsible for his or his actions. Neither aspect of public interest can be ignored. Both are vital to the preservation of the integrity of the administration of justice
92. It is now well settled by the decision of this Court in Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu that the Speaker while acting under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution acts as a Tribunal and his decision can be challenged only in a court exercising constitutional jurisdiction. It was held in Kashinath Jalmi v. Speaker that even the Speaker does not have the power to review the decision taken by him under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution. Under these circumstances, there is absolutely no question of the Deputy Speaker setting aside the order of the Speaker passed under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution
93. Every good that is perceived to be in the interest of society cannot be mandated by the court. Nor is the judicial process an answer to every social ill which a public interest petitioner perceives. A matter such as the present to which a solution does not rest in a legal or constitutional framework is incapable of being dealt with in terms of judicially manageable standards
95. Apex Court's direction about seizure, storage and disposal of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances
96. Deprivation of property within the meaning of Article 300A, generally speaking, must take place for public purpose or public interest
97. We therefore, deem it appropriate to impose exemplary costs quantified at Rs.25,00,000.00 (Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs only) to be paid by each of the three parties i.e. GGL, MGG and RUIAS. The said amount is to be paid to National Legal Services Authority as compensation for the loss of judicial time of this country and the same may be utilized by the National Legal Services Authority to fund poor litigants to pursue their claims before this Court in deserving cases
98. A public prosecutor is not a mouth-piece of the investigating agency
99. Clause (5) of Article 15 and Art. 21A of the Constitution do not alter the basic structure or frame work of the Constitution and are constitutionally valid
100. Jayalalitha's case regarding allegation of her alleged didporportionate of asset, in which her conviction awarded by trial court has been set aside by The Karnataka High Court
101. Guidelines enabling adoption of children by persons irrespective of religion, caste, creed etc
102. Md. Ajmal Md. Amir Kasab @ Abu Mujahid Vs. State of Maharashtra
103.Legal principles as to the maintainability of a writ petition
104. Where certain number of posts are reserved in favour socially and economically backward classes, meritorious candidates belonging to those classes should be appointed to posts falling in the open category
108. Entire procedding pertaining to land acquisition at SINGUR are quashed by this SC judgement
119. Supreme court directions for proper implementation of scheme of shelters for urban homeless.
128. Direction made by Apex court to Central Government in view of grave air quality situation.
130. Safeguards which must be introduced for proper implementation of MPLAD scheme
157. Apex court's direction regarding status of casual worker.
162. The legal profession is different from other professions in that what the lawyers do, affects not only an individual but the administration of justice which is the foundation of the civilised society. Both as a leading member of the intelligentsia of the society and as an intelligent citizen, the lawyer has to conduct himself as a model for others both in his professional and in his private and public life.
163. Dispose of the Execution Proceedings within six months from the date of filing
© Official website of WBJA, India